MEMBANGUN KOMPETENSI ABAD 21 MELALUI METODE CONSTRUCTIVE CONTROVERSY PADA PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA INGGRIS

Leny Sri Wahyuni

Abstract


This study aims to describe an image of cooperative learning model application through constructive controversy method in building 21st century competencies towards English learning. This study uses descriptive qualitative which took place at the second grade of SMKN 1 Talaga, Majalengka. Collecting data is done by using observation, interview, and documentation. The results illustrate that the ability to communicate, collaborate, think critically, and creatively in students can be built through controversial issues which make them challenged to discuss actively, intensively, and comprehensively. The use of 'gambits' in form of asking and giving opinions is quite effective to encourage students to analyze (communicate actively and effectively) related to the issues raised, collaborate intensively on various ideas to make decisions, and formulate solutions by constructing ideas from various results of divergent thinking.

 

Keywords: 21st century competencies; English learning; cooperative learning model; constructive controversy method; controversy issues

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aliyyatunnisa, Azharani. (2019). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif, Kritis, dan Komunikasi Siswa Matematika dalam Academic-Constructive Controversy (AC). PEDIAMATIKA: Journal of Mathematical Science and Mathematics Education, Volume 01 No. 01, Hlm. 1-10.

Alwasilah, A.Chaedar. (2008). Pokoknya Kualitatif. Jakarta: PT. Dunia Pustaka Jaya.

Ary, Donald., Jacobs, Lucy Cheser., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Canada: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Chen, Guoquan., dkk. (2011). Constructive Controversy for Learning and Team Effectiveness in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, Volume 49 No. 01, Hlm. 88-104. DOI: 10.1177/1038411110391708

Daniels, Mats., & Cajander, Ã…sa. (2010). Experiences from Using Constructive Controversy in an Open-ended Group Project Washington, DC: 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.

Felder, Richard M., & Brent, Rebecca. (2007). Cooperative Learning. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. ACS Symposium Series 970, Chapter 4, Hlm. 34-53.

Filah, Alfia Nur. (2016). Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Siswa melalui Pendekatan Constructive Controversy. Prosiding SEMNASDIK Prodi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Madura, Hlm. 62-66.

Guntur, Mochamad., Aliyyatunnisa, Azharani., & Kartono. (2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif, Kritis, dan Komunikasi Matematika Siswa dalam Academic Constructive Controversy. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika 3 ISSN 2613-9189, Hlm. 385-392.

Johnson, David. W., & Johnson, Roger T. (1987). Joining Together: Group theory and group skills (3rd edition). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Johnson, David. W., Johnson, Roger T., & Smith, Karl A. (1996). Academic Controversy: Enriching college instruction through intellectual conflict. Washington, D.C: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.

Johnson David. W., Johnson, Roger T., & D. Tjosvold. (2006). Constructive Controversy: The value of intellectual opposition. In the Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Hlm. 69-91.

Komara, Cahya., & Sriyanto, Widi. (2018). The Effectiveness of Applying Constructive Controversy Method in Gaining Student’s Critical Thinking for Writing Argumentative Essay. Getsempena English Education Journal (GEEJ), Volume 5 No. 02, Hlm. 177-186.

Liu, Ou Lydia., Frankel, Lois., & Roohr, Katrina Crotts. (2014). Assessing Critical Thinking in Higher Education: Current State and Directions for Next-Generation Assessment. ETS Research Report Series ISSN 2330-8516. Doi:10.1002/Ets2.12009.

Luawo, Aprilia., Lukum, Astin., & Iyabu, Hendri. (2017). Upaya Peningkatan Hasil Belajar dengan Metode Constructive Controversy pada Materi Asam Basa. Jurnal Entropi, Volume 12 No. 01, Hlm. 87-95.

Mufanti, Restu. (2015). Potential Educatiobal Benefits of Incorporating Structured Controversy in EFL Context and Its Possible Challenges. Cendikia, Volume 13 No. 12, Hlm. 275-291.

Prawira, Y. A. (2013). Keragaman sosiolinguistik berupa pilihan bahasa ragam tuturan menolak pada peserta diklat di tempat kerja kota Sukabumi. Tatar Pasundan Balai DIklat Keagaman, 53(9), 1689–1699. Retrieved from http://isjd.pdii.lipi.go.id/file_download/VII202013327333_2085-4005.pdf

Roseth, Cary J., Saltarelli, Andy J., & Glass, Chris R. (2011). Effects of Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Constructive Controversy on Social Interdependence, Motivation, and Achievement. Michigan State University: American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/a0024213.

Rukmana, Fikha Ilma Hayati. (2017). Efektifitas Metode Kooperatif dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Prosiding: Konferensi Nasional Bahasa Arab III ISSN 2597-5242. Hlm. 180-188.

Turiman, Punia., Jizah, Omar., Adzliana, Mohd Daud., & Kamisah, Osman. (2011). Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. Volume 59, Hlm. 110-116.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.38075/tp.v14i2.44

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Leny Sri Wahyuni

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.