PEMERIAN KECAKAPAN REPRESENTASI MATEMATIS SISWA SMP DALAM MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR

Kirana Qurotal Aini Prawira, Jarnawi Afgani Dahlan, Tia Purniati

Abstract


This research was carried out to expose the potential for mathematical representation of geometric materials. Students in the middle grades were used for this study. Case study methodology is used to conduct this study from a qualitative perspective. A mathematical representation instrument based on a five-item description is utilised to convey the findings of the inquiry. According to the findings, out of the four indications of "mathematical representation," students' abilities on picture representation indicators are higher than their abilities on other indicators of "mathematical representation," such as visual, mathematical expressions, and text representation. According to the other findings, the capability of representing text had the lowest ability overall, as shown by the number of students who were unable to solve the problem that was presented to them. Other results showed that text representation had the lowest ability, as seen by the number of students who did not complete the assignment.

Keywords: mathematical representation skill; planar shape; problem-solving aptitude


Full Text:

PDF

References


Lestari, K. E., & Yudhanegara, M. R. (2015). Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. United States of America: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Achyanadia, S. (2016). Peran Teknologi Pendidikan Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Sdm. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 5(1), 11–21. http://doi.org/10.32832/tek.pend.v5i1.486

Aditomo, A., & Faridz, N. F. (2019). Ketimpangan mutu dan akses pendidikan di Indonesia: Potret berdasarkan survei PISA 2015.

Afriansyah, E. A., Herman, T., Turmudi, T., & Dahlan, J. A. (2020). Mendesain soal berbasis masalah untuk kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis calon guru. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 239–250.

Akbar, A., & Noviani, N. (2019). Tantangan dan solusi dalam perkembangan teknologi pendidikan di Indonesia. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pgri Palembang.

Alexiou-Ray, J. A., Wilson, E., Wright, V. H., & Peirano, A. (2003). Changing instructional practice: The impact of technology integration on students, parents, and school personnel. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 2(2), 58–80.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Peneliltian. Rineka Cipta (Vol. 33). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Asiala, M., Brown, A., DeVries, D. J., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D., & Thomas, K. (1997). A framework for research and curriculum development in undergraduate mathematics education. Maa Notes, 2, 37–54.

Cesaria, A., Herman, T., & Dahlan, J. A. (2021). Level Berpikir Geometri Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Teori Van Hiele pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Jurnal Elemen, 7(2), 267–279.

Chauhan, S. (2017). A meta-analysis of the impact of technology on learning effectiveness of elementary students. Computers & Education, 105, 14–30.

Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2001). Instruments for assessing the impact of technology in education. Computers in the Schools, 18(2–3), 5–25.

Cloete, A. L. (2017). Technology and education: Challenges and opportunities. HTS: Theological Studies, 73(3), 1–7.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). John W. Creswell-Research Design_ Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches-. SAGE Publications Inc.

Dahlan, J. A., & Juandi, D. (2011). Analisis representasi matematik siswa sekolah dasar dalam penyelesaian masalah matematika kontekstual. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 16(1), 128–138.

Denbel, D. G. (2015). Functions in the Secondary School Mathematics Curriculum. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(1), 77–81.

Drijvers, P. (2015). Digital technology in mathematics education: Why it works (or doesn’t). In Selected regular lectures from the 12th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 135–151). Springer.

Gumport, P. J., & Chun, M. (1999). Technology and higher education: Opportunities and challenges for the new era. National Center for Postsecondary Improvement, Stanford University, School ….

Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A. (2007). From intended curriculum to written curriculum: Examining the voice of a mathematics textbook. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(4), 344–369.

Hewi, L., & Shaleh, M. (2020). Refleksi hasil PISA (the programme for international student assesment): Upaya perbaikan bertumpu pada pendidikan anak usia dini. Jurnal Golden Age, 4(1), 30–41.

Irawati, E., & Susetyo, W. (2017). Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional Di Blitar. Jurnal Supremasi, 3.

Kemdikbud. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. Kemdikbud RI (Vol. 7).

Megahantara, G. S. (2017). Pengaruh teknologi terhadap pendidikan di abad 21. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Nasution, H. (2021). Dampak Perkembangan Teknologi Ditinjau dari Aspek Pendidikan, Marketing dan Organisasi.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for Scholl Mathematics. US National Council TM. New York: US NCTM.

Prabowo, A., & Dahlan, J. A. (2020). Pengembangan tes matematika dengan konteks COVID-19 untuk siswa SMP/MTs kelas VIII. Jurnal Elemen, 6(2), 302–317.

Pratiwi, I. (2019). Efek program PISA terhadap kurikulum di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 4(1), 51–71.

Prawira, Y. A., Ayundari, V. L., & Kurnia, T. (2021). Exploring Students’ Affective on Using Asynchronous Learning During the Pandemic Period. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 33–50. http://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v7i1.9740

Rastuti, M., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2021). The programme for international student assessment research in Indonesia. Jurnal Elemen, 7(2), 232–253.

Sudihartinih, E., & Purniati, T. (2017). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Mahasiswa dalam Perkuliahan Geometri Analitik pada Konsep Irisan Kerucut dengan Menggunakan Alat Peraga. In Prosiding Pada Seminar Nasional Matematika Di UNPAR Bandung (Vol. 12).

Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfbeta (Vol. 8). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Syafri, F. S. (2017). Kemampuan Representasi Matematis dan Kemampuan Pembuktian Matematika. Jurnal Edumath, 3, 55.

Taopan, Y. F., Oedjoe, M. R., & Sogen, A. N. (2019). Dampak Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Terhadap Perilaku Moral Remaja di SMA Negeri 3 Kota Kupang. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 61. http://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v5i1.1395

UU_No.20/2003. (2003). Undang-undang Sistem Pendidikan, 71, 6–6.

Wahyuningsih, S. (2014). Implementasi Sistem Pendidikan Islam Pada Masa Daulah Abbasiyah Dan Pada Masa Sekarang. Jurnal Kependidikan, 2(2), 109–126.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.38075/tp.v17i1.319

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Kirana Qurotal Aini Prawira; Jarnawi Afgani Dahlan; Tia Purniati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.